Video index
Roll Call: 11 members present, 0 members absent, 0 members excused.
A. WORKSHOP AGENDA
(1) Discuss agenda items.
B. AGENDA
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
D. CALL TO ORDER.
Chairman Hudson called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM and noted for the record the seven (7) Commissioners were present.
E. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS:
(2) No items.
F. PUBLIC HEARING:
(3) Consider Case Z-1065-06; an Amendment to Kentsdale Farm Planned Development (PD-92). This proposed amendment would add 8 additional acres to PD-92. The area in question is located south of Parkerville Road and west of Melody Lane. The applicant is Wildwood Development.
Ms. Linda Zombeck, Senior Planner, gave the staff report.
Management Report for Case Z-1065-06
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any questions of staff. There being no response he declared the public hearing open and called the applicant forward.
Mr. Richard Rozier, of 1805 Westmoreland Road, representing Wildwood Development came forward to address the Commission. He informed the Commission that he was available to answer any questions the Commission may have regarding the Amendment to Kentsdale Farm Planned Development (PD-92).
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any questions for Mr. Rozier.
Commissioner Vaughn expressed her concerns about the landscaping surrounding the detention pond.
Mr. Rozier informed the Commission that he was not sure of the exact landscape plans for the detention pond area, but the developer usually provides some kind of water feature and landscaping for the detention pond area.
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any other questions for Mr. Rozier. There being no response he asked if anyone wished to speak in favor or in opposition of Case Z-1065-06. There being no response he declared the public hearing closed.
Commissioner Valentine stated that landscaping for the detention pond area should be stipulated in the Planned Development Amendment.
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any other questions or comments that needed to be discussed. There being no response he asked for a motion.
Motion to Approve case Z-1065-06; an Amendment to Kentsdale Farm Planned Development 92 (PD-92). Moved by Commissioner Tom Simerly, seconded by Commissioner Karen Vaughn.
with the following stipulation:
1. Landscaping shall be provided around the detention ponds such that concrete is not visible and detention ponds appear natural from the street or from any lot.
Vote to Approve case Z-1065-06; an Amendment to Kentsdale Farm Planned Development 92 (PD-92). (Approved)
(4) Consider Case Z-1066-06; an Amendment to Heath Creek West Planned Development 105 (PD-105) in regards to a 6.88 acre site on Lot 6, Block A. This proposed amendment would revise the site plan for a proposed mixed use on the 6.88 acre site. The area in question is located north of Belt Line Road and east of Elerson Road. The applicant is Dunaway Associates, L.P.
Ms. Linda Zombeck, Senior Planner, gave the staff report.
Management Report for Case Z-1066-06
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any questions of staff.
Commissioner Simerly asked for the dimensions of the compact parking stalls.
Mr. Brent O’Neal, 1501 Merrimac Circle, Fort Worth, representing Dunaway Associates came forward to address the Commission. He informed the Commission that the dimensions of the parking were nine by eighteen (9X18).
Chairman Hudson asked if there were any other questions of staff. There being no response he asked for the applicant to come forward.
Mr. O’Neal came forward to address the Commission. He informed the Commission that he was present to answer any questions the Commission may have regarding the Amendment to Heath Creek West Planned Development 105 (PD-105).
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any questions for Mr. O’Neal.
Commissioner Simerly stated that having compact parking stalls service as primary parking spaces for the retail does not seem functional. In addition, he stated that he would prefer to utilize the parallel parking stalling area as an additional area for landscaping.
Chairman Hudson asked Mr. O’Neal if he would be in opposition of the Commission waving the parallel parking stalls.
Mr. O’Neal informed the Commission that he would like to utilize the parallel parking stalls as an additional area for landscaping because it would benefit the site, but to meet the required parking standards of the planned development ordinance extra parking stalls were required.
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any other questions for Mr. O’Neal.
Mr. Kent McIIyar, Assistant City Attorney, informed the Commission that according to the Development Code the correct compact parking stall size is nine by sixteen (9X16) and not the nine by eighteen (9X18) stated earlier.
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any other questions or comments for Mr. O’Neal. There being no response he asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor or in opposition of case Z-1066-06. There being no response he declared the public hearing closed and asked the Commission for a motion.
Motion to Approve case Z-1066-06; an Amendment to Heath Creek West Planned Development 105 (PD-105). Moved by Commissioner Karen Vaughn, seconded by Commissioner Denise Valentine.
Vote to Approve case Z-1066-06; an Amendment to Heath Creek West Planned Development 105 (PD-105). (Approved)
G. REGULAR AGENDA:
(5) No Items.
H. REPORTS TO COMMISSION:
(6) Report on City Council activity.
No items.
(7) Report on upcoming agenda items, projects or meetings.
No items.
I. ADJOURNMENT.
Being there was no other business; Chairman Hudson adjourned the meeting at 7:23 PM.
Jul 11, 2006 Planning and Zoning Meeting
Full agenda
Share this video
Video Index
Full agenda
Share
Roll Call: 11 members present, 0 members absent, 0 members excused.
A. WORKSHOP AGENDA
(1) Discuss agenda items.
B. AGENDA
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
D. CALL TO ORDER.
Chairman Hudson called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM and noted for the record the seven (7) Commissioners were present.
E. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS:
(2) No items.
F. PUBLIC HEARING:
(3) Consider Case Z-1065-06; an Amendment to Kentsdale Farm Planned Development (PD-92). This proposed amendment would add 8 additional acres to PD-92. The area in question is located south of Parkerville Road and west of Melody Lane. The applicant is Wildwood Development.
Ms. Linda Zombeck, Senior Planner, gave the staff report.
Management Report for Case Z-1065-06
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any questions of staff. There being no response he declared the public hearing open and called the applicant forward.
Mr. Richard Rozier, of 1805 Westmoreland Road, representing Wildwood Development came forward to address the Commission. He informed the Commission that he was available to answer any questions the Commission may have regarding the Amendment to Kentsdale Farm Planned Development (PD-92).
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any questions for Mr. Rozier.
Commissioner Vaughn expressed her concerns about the landscaping surrounding the detention pond.
Mr. Rozier informed the Commission that he was not sure of the exact landscape plans for the detention pond area, but the developer usually provides some kind of water feature and landscaping for the detention pond area.
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any other questions for Mr. Rozier. There being no response he asked if anyone wished to speak in favor or in opposition of Case Z-1065-06. There being no response he declared the public hearing closed.
Commissioner Valentine stated that landscaping for the detention pond area should be stipulated in the Planned Development Amendment.
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any other questions or comments that needed to be discussed. There being no response he asked for a motion.
Motion to Approve case Z-1065-06; an Amendment to Kentsdale Farm Planned Development 92 (PD-92). Moved by Commissioner Tom Simerly, seconded by Commissioner Karen Vaughn.
with the following stipulation:
1. Landscaping shall be provided around the detention ponds such that concrete is not visible and detention ponds appear natural from the street or from any lot.
Vote to Approve case Z-1065-06; an Amendment to Kentsdale Farm Planned Development 92 (PD-92). (Approved)
(4) Consider Case Z-1066-06; an Amendment to Heath Creek West Planned Development 105 (PD-105) in regards to a 6.88 acre site on Lot 6, Block A. This proposed amendment would revise the site plan for a proposed mixed use on the 6.88 acre site. The area in question is located north of Belt Line Road and east of Elerson Road. The applicant is Dunaway Associates, L.P.
Ms. Linda Zombeck, Senior Planner, gave the staff report.
Management Report for Case Z-1066-06
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any questions of staff.
Commissioner Simerly asked for the dimensions of the compact parking stalls.
Mr. Brent O’Neal, 1501 Merrimac Circle, Fort Worth, representing Dunaway Associates came forward to address the Commission. He informed the Commission that the dimensions of the parking were nine by eighteen (9X18).
Chairman Hudson asked if there were any other questions of staff. There being no response he asked for the applicant to come forward.
Mr. O’Neal came forward to address the Commission. He informed the Commission that he was present to answer any questions the Commission may have regarding the Amendment to Heath Creek West Planned Development 105 (PD-105).
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any questions for Mr. O’Neal.
Commissioner Simerly stated that having compact parking stalls service as primary parking spaces for the retail does not seem functional. In addition, he stated that he would prefer to utilize the parallel parking stalling area as an additional area for landscaping.
Chairman Hudson asked Mr. O’Neal if he would be in opposition of the Commission waving the parallel parking stalls.
Mr. O’Neal informed the Commission that he would like to utilize the parallel parking stalls as an additional area for landscaping because it would benefit the site, but to meet the required parking standards of the planned development ordinance extra parking stalls were required.
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any other questions for Mr. O’Neal.
Mr. Kent McIIyar, Assistant City Attorney, informed the Commission that according to the Development Code the correct compact parking stall size is nine by sixteen (9X16) and not the nine by eighteen (9X18) stated earlier.
Chairman Hudson asked the Commission if there were any other questions or comments for Mr. O’Neal. There being no response he asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor or in opposition of case Z-1066-06. There being no response he declared the public hearing closed and asked the Commission for a motion.
Motion to Approve case Z-1066-06; an Amendment to Heath Creek West Planned Development 105 (PD-105). Moved by Commissioner Karen Vaughn, seconded by Commissioner Denise Valentine.
Vote to Approve case Z-1066-06; an Amendment to Heath Creek West Planned Development 105 (PD-105). (Approved)
G. REGULAR AGENDA:
(5) No Items.
H. REPORTS TO COMMISSION:
(6) Report on City Council activity.
No items.
(7) Report on upcoming agenda items, projects or meetings.
No items.
I. ADJOURNMENT.
Being there was no other business; Chairman Hudson adjourned the meeting at 7:23 PM.
Link
Start video at
Social
Embed
<iframe title="Swagit Video Player" width="640" height="360" src="https://desototx.new.swagit.com/videos/242964/embed" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Disable autoplay on embedded content?
Download
Download
Download Selected Item
